For New York businesses, labor law compliance is not a bureaucratic formality. It is a foundational business obligation with serious legal and financial consequences. Nowhere is the risk more acute than in worker classification. Misclassifying an employee as an independent contractor can expose your business to back taxes, penalties, litigation, and, under newly enacted legislation, a complete shutdown of operations.

New York law draws a sharp distinction between employees and independent contractors. Employees are entitled to a robust array of protections under the New York Labor Law, including minimum wage and overtime pay, workers’ compensation coverage, unemployment insurance, temporary disability benefits, paid family leave, and mandatory rest and meal breaks. Independent contractors, by contrast, are not entitled to these protections. The financial temptation for employers to label workers as contractors, rather than employees, is significant. But the legal risk of doing so incorrectly is even greater.

According to the New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL), purposeful misclassification is considered one of the most serious issues impacting the workforce. The agency treats it unambiguously: If you misclassify a worker to avoid compliance with unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, Social Security, tax withholding, or minimum wage laws, that is considered fraud.

New York applies a stricter standard than federal law. While the IRS uses a “common law” test and the FLSA relies on an “economic reality” analysis, New York uses a modified ABC test for unemployment insurance purposes, plus additional scrutiny under wage and hour law. Under the ABC test, a worker can only be classified as an independent contractor if the hiring party proves: (A) the worker is free from the hirer’s control and under contract; (B) the work is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade or business of the same nature. Critically, a signed contract calling someone an “independent contractor” does not make them one. The designation is based on the reality of how the work is actually performed.

Companies that get classification wrong face a cascading series of consequences. Under New York law, penalties can reach $5,000 per misclassified worker, plus back wages, liquidated damages, and interest. Misclassified workers have a six-year statute of limitations under New York law to pursue claims. This is far longer than the two to three years available under federal law. This means that exposure can compound significantly over time. Companies may also face liability for unpaid overtime, unemployment insurance contributions, workers’ compensation premiums, uncovered workplace injury claims, and FICA taxes that should have been withheld. Repeat offenders risk criminal charges. The cost to workers is equally stark: misclassified employees lose an estimated $10,000 to $20,000 per year in wages and benefits compared to properly classified employees.

The enforcement landscape just got significantly stronger. In March 2025, the New York State Senate unanimously passed Senate Bill S1514, authorizing the NYSDOL Commissioner to issue stop-work orders against employers who knowingly misclassify workers. Upon receiving written notice, an employer has just 72 hours to come into compliance before a stop-work order halts all business operations at every affected site. Employers who fail to comply face additional penalties of $1,000 to $5,000 per day. The stakes are real: a 2022 report found that over 870,000 New York workers, approximately 1 in 10, are misclassified.

Compliance starts with an honest assessment of how your workers actually function, not how their contracts describe them. Businesses should audit all contractor relationships against the ABC test, consult employment counsel before engaging contractors for long-term or core-business work, maintain thorough documentation of the independent nature of those relationships, and establish internal protocols for periodic classification reviews. The question is never what your contract says. It is whether the working relationship actually supports the classification.

Key warning signs that suggest employee status rather than independent contractor status include the following:

The worker cannot increase profit through efficiency or skill and is paid the same regardless of performance.

Company supplies all tools, software, and equipment with no business investment by the worker.

Indefinite or continuous relationship with no project end date or auto-renewing arrangements.

The company sets the worker’s schedule, methods, and supervises their work.

The work is core to what the company does, rather than ancillary services.

The worker serves only one client and works full-time hours.

Companies, especially in the New York City For-Hire Vehicle (FHV) industry, should conduct annual classification audits, especially when managing multiple contractor relationships. Before engaging contractors, obtain signed W-9 forms and certificates of insurance to avoid scrambling during tax season. For uncertain cases, companies can request IRS guidance by submitting Form SS-8 for an official determination of worker status. When the totality of factors indicates employee status, companies should reclassify workers promptly, as the contractual “not an employee” language will not protect against liability.

As always, I offer free consultations to business owners to help determine if their workers are properly classified as independent contractors. My goal is to ensure that the FHV industry in New York City survives and thrives well into the future.

Steven J. Shanker, Esq. is General Counsel to the Livery Roundtable, Inc. and the New York Independent Livery Driver Benefit Fund.

Article by Steven J. Shanker, Esq.

Steven J. Shanker, Esq. is General Counsel to the Livery Roundtable, Inc. and the New York Independent Livery Driver Benefit Fund.

See All Articles